The story ran on the New York Times’ first page on Wednesday, directly underneath its coverage of the principal State of the Union by President (and lifelong New Yorker) Donald J. Trump. The article contends that current turmoil at the Los Angeles Times — which has as of late observed turnover of its best administration, a fruitful unionization effort, and an undeniably tense newsroom condition — is “symptomatic” of the city’s “absence of solid institutions to bind it together.”
The Published Article
The New York Times on Wednesday issued a story on the usual backwater known as Los Angeles, and it turned out poorly well with Angelenos.
Argument About The City
The story opens with the current tension at the Los Angeles Times — an honest to the subject of a news article — however then rapidly proceeds onward to make a considerably more extensive discussion about the city.
People Who Loved The Article
Some people did like the published article, like employees of The New York Times, loved the take.
Accusation On The City
Wondering why the difficulties at the LA Times were some way or another an accusation to the city of 4 million individuals. Turn next to read more.
In the middle of the whole head-scratching, some saw there were basic true mistakes in the story.
Lack Of Philanthropy
It additionally turns out that the ranking the Times used to prove LA has an “absence of philanthropy” doesn’t really show that to any extent of the intelligence. Turn next to read more.
The Charity Navigator scores, which once more, measure the health of charitable organizations, not the amount of charity, really rank LA. Wait for it, it’s higher than New York.
Some noted that the piece appeared to carefully choose data to suit its purposes.